Countdown to the Debt Ceiling Deadline – Who Will Blink First?

| July 14, 2011 | Comments (4)

This debate has become personal and heated

The country is riveted by the spectacle of President Obama and the Republican leadership participating in difficult talks to raise the debt ceiling before the August 2nd date set by Tim Geithner, the Treasury Secretary.

The talks have become contentious, even bitterly so, with both Democratic and Republican politicians going on the airwaves to accuse the other party of unseriousness and inflexibility.

Earlier discussions led by Vice President Biden and later including the President focused on cuts of about $2.5 trillion, with the Democratic side seeking to close corporate tax loopholes e.g., for oil companies, and letting the Bush tax cuts expire in 2013 for the wealthy.

The Republican side, influenced  (some would would say, hamstrung) by the large Tea Party freshman contingent, has remained adamant about levying no new taxes.

The President upped the stakes a few days ago by seeking even deeper cuts of up to $4 trillion as part of a “grand bargain”

McConnell, Cantor, and Boehner: in lockstep or divided?

that would also see taxes raised on the richest Americans, and many corporate loopholes axed.  Some examples touted included the tax-free status of corporate jet purchases.

This was met with the same response by the Republican side, which continues to insist that their position on no new taxes is non-negotiable.

The Democratic leaders in the Senate and House – Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi have also added their voices to the fray, declaring that the would not allow the sacrifice of poor and middle class entitlements e.g., Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid to a debt ceiling agreement.

To make it more interesting, a major ratings agency – Standard and Poor today declared the US credit rating to be under review for a possible downgrade in view of the political impasse and increased likelihood of default.

Bachmann and the Politics of the Right

Enter Michelle Bachmann and a few others in the Republican camp who say that default will have no effect on the U.S. economy.  This position is repudiated by practically all serious economists including Ben Bernanke, Chairman of the Federal Reserve.

Interestingly, most of the Republican presidential candidates have signed a pledge to vote against raising taxes of any kind…ever.

This pledge, created by Grover Norquist, president and founder of Americans for Tax Reform, reads:

“I _____ pledge to the taxpayers of the state of _____ and all the people of this state, that I will oppose and vote against all efforts to increase taxes.”

What will Happen

I have to admit that among our staff here, we are almost evenly split regarding what might happen in regard to the debt ceiling talks.

The reality is that anyone claims to know with absolute certainty what will happen is simply making an educated (or uneducated) guess.  Here are reasons why we might default.

  1. Both parties have publicly locked themselves into opposing positions.  They have also done it publicly, making it harder for them to climbdown.
  2. On the Republican side, there is an absolutist position against taxes, just as Democrats have a strong position of a “balanced  position” and “shared sacrifice” – code for the rich and corporations carrying what they see as a more equitable load.
  3. Personalities are getting in the way, with reports of particularly fractious encounters between Eric Cantor – the Republican majority leader – and the President.
  4. Too many on the Republican side believe – without evidence, that there will be no negative consequences of default. We here believe otherwise.
On the other side, why we won’t default:
  1. The more serious and reflective politicians on both sides recognize that credit default is unthinkable and will most likely lead to another recession.
  2. The credit ratings agencies will not only raise the alert before August 2 (as Standard and Poor just did), but may actually lower the US credit rating before August 2nd, if agreement seems unlikely.  This may help to concentrate minds.
  3. The stock market will likely suffer heavy losses in the days before August 2nd, which again, may convey reality to the negotiators.
  4. Public disgust and fear (especially if there is a stock market crash) may drive the parties involved to agreement.

Currently, a new plan has been introduced by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to allow the debt ceiling to be raised without a deal.

The proposal would allow the president to raise the limit by $2.5 trillion in increments over the next year, allowing Congress the chance to stop them only through protest votes that would have to survive a presidential veto.

His objective is to leave the President holding the bag for any tax increases and failures to cut the deficit. However, it is not clear whether this new plan has the support of enough Republicans and several have lashed out against it.

The reality is that the deficit should be handled and if it is not done now, when there is a hard deadline, it will likely not be done afterwards.

Republicans and Democrats should sit down and work out a fair agreement without the pressure of lobbyists, who only complicate matters.  They should realize that entitlements have to be cut, along with defense spending – that other “untouchable”.  They must also realize that the disastrous Bush tax cuts have to be scaled back for the very rich and the tax laws that industries like the oil industry “wrote” for themselves must be repealed.

They must do this all for the sake of the country they claim to love.

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Category: News and Opinion

  • http://www.theviewfromoutsidemytinywindow.blogspot.com InspectorClouseau

    During the last Presidential election, CSpan2 Book TV aired
    a program where the author discussed the results of his or her research, which
    suggested that something like 5-10% of Democrats , and 5-10% of Republicans,
    essentially debated and defined the ideological constructs of each party.  The point was that the vast, vast, vast
    majority of the citizens of this country have their lives dictated by the most
    active and vocal members of society, who also happen to be more privileged .

     

    I strongly suspect that the same thing is occurring with the
    debt ceiling debate.  The debate is not
    really about the debt ceiling per se, but rather a very deep, long-standing
    debate about the role and size of government. 
    It’s never been resolved, and never will be resolved in our
    representative democracy.  However, in
    the mean time, the regular folks in our society run the risk of being
    irreparably damaged.  The elites (the
    upper and upper middle socio-economic classes) on each side of the fence have
    theirs, their corporate contributions, decent jobs and income, and will fare
    just fine economically.  It’s the
    ordinary citizens (lower middle socio-economic class) who will most likely get
    screwed, no matter which side ultimately prevails in the short term.

  • Susan Thomas

    If the Chinese boasted today that their command economy was superior to Western democracy, it would be harder to argue with them.  Europe is in shambles and the US is stuck in gridlock.

    I think the US ideological debate will eventually be solved but it may take default, credit downgrades, a deep and punishing recession and then an election to force people to figure out that voting against their own self-interest (unless you are in the top 2% or a large corporation) is just plain stupid.

  • http://www.theviewfromoutsidemytinywindow.blogspot.com InspectorClouseau

    You’re probably right Susan.  I think that the U.S. has one more rally left in it.  We’re not down for the count yet.

    There is a link on my blog to an article on Edge entitled, “What Makes People Vote Republican.”  In the first paragraph, the author asks this question: “Why in particular do working class and rural Americans vote for pro-business Republicans when their economic interests would seem better served by Democratic policies?”  Self interest is a complicated, psychological something….

  • Susan Thomas

    Hey, I agree that the US has one good rally left in it. Its just that more and more, we need too many things to line up to get that shot.

    Instead, we have “the best kind of government money can buy”, where legislation is paid for by lobbyists.

    Talking about self interest, I could name several past world leaders who had fanatical national followings but led their people – through initial elections, many forget, into catastrophe.  What’s that fella’s name in Germany again…?


Triple Advantage - Free Credit Score              Manage Your Credit with Equifax